This issue that is precise never been determined by a Virginia appellate level court, but a few circuit choices have actually addressed the problem. For instance, in Helmes v. Helmes, 41 Va. Cir. 277 (1997), Wife accused Husband smoke tits in a grievance for Divorce of intimately abusing their daughter. Husband denied the punishment inside the response. At his deposition, he sought to invoke the Fifth Amendment when questioned concerning the abuse that is alleged. The test court held that their Fifth Amendment workout had been appropriate. The test court discovered that though there had been no Virginia case that is appellate on the topic, other states have actually held in a similar manner in reported decisions. See also Goodrich v. Goodrich, 1994 WL 1031011 (Va. Cir. 1994).
Likewise, in Pelliccia v. McKeithen, 59 Va. Cir. 483 (2002), a partition situation, an effort court held that the denial of unlawful task in a remedy would not waive one’s right to say the Fifth Amendment for the activity that is same subsequent discovery.
On the reverse side with this argument is Leitner v. Leitner, 11 Va. Cir. 281 (1988). In Leitner, Wife filed for divorce, alleging adultery.
Husband denied the allegations, and affirmatively alleged that he previously been a “faithful and dutiful” spouse. The test court held that husband had waived their fifth Amendment right — plus in reality it twice — once for alleging faithfulness (which “opened the door” to questions regarding adultery), and a second time by denying the adultery in his initial pleadings that he had waived.