In the event that papers submitted try not to offer sufficient evidence of a real conjugal relationship in the context of a wedding or common-law relationship, or if officers question that the applicant is managing the sponsor, an officer may request extra information or schedule an interview. To greatly help evaluate whether R4(1) needs are met, an officer gets the discernment, for a case-by-case foundation, to request that the sponsor and applicant complete and submit a Supplementary union Questionnaire IMM 5526 (PDF, 742 KB ) and/or to convoke them for an meeting.
Spouse or common-law partner in Canada situations requiring further research should really be described an inland IRCC workplace. The regional IRCC workplace may interview both the sponsor additionally the applicant, separately, to ascertain whether or not the relationship is genuine. See Relationships of convenience for facets that could be considered in this meeting.
Follow fairness that is procedural whenever issues arise which are product into the choice. All questions posed and answers given in the interview if an applicant is interviewed to address concerns, record. Where relevant, the meeting records will then be used to substantiate your decision made regarding the application. It is particularly essential, offered the right of a sponsor to attract the refusal of a credit card applicatoin processed abroad underneath the grouped family members course.
Sponsors and sponsored partners and lovers can voluntarily provide– that is consent form IMM 5532 (Relationship Information and Sponsorship Evaluation) – for IRCC to discharge with their spouse or partner any information obtained associated with a study of wedding fraudulence. When they offer permission with this type, a spouse or partner is liberated to revoke it whenever you want by advising CPC-M written down.